Building semiconductor plants in the US takes twice as long, costs twice as much as in Taiwan

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 424   +10
Staff
The big picture: The U.S. and many Western markets are simply not as efficient as Taiwan in building semiconductor fabrication (fab) operations. According to reports, 18 new fab construction projects are planned for 2025 alone, making it crucial to address these challenges. The West must streamline fab construction processes to catch up with the well-established semiconductor ecosystems of Taiwan and other Asian manufacturing hubs.

TSMC encountered significant challenges when it began constructing its fab in Arizona, facing a trifecta of issues that underscored the stark contrast between fab construction in the U.S. and Taiwan. First, TSMC struggled to find skilled workers locally, a problem rarely encountered in Taiwan. Second, cultural differences between TSMC's Taiwanese management and American employees created unforeseen obstacles. Perhaps most critically, navigating local regulations proved difficult for the global chip manufacturer.

However, these issues were not solely due to TSMC's inexperience in the U.S. market. Rather, they highlighted a fundamental gap in fab construction efficiency between the U.S. and Taiwan.

Taiwan has developed remarkable expertise in building semiconductor fabrication facilities, closely followed by China and Southeast Asia. This efficiency is evident in the timelines and costs associated with fab construction across different regions.

As reported by Semiconductor Digest, Herbert Blaschitz, Executive VP of the Global Business Unit for Advanced Technology Facilities at Exyte, spoke at the recent SEMI Industry Strategy Symposium and revealed that a very large fab in Taiwan – owned by a U.S. company (which he declined to name) – was built in approximately 20 months.

In contrast, fabs in the U.S. typically take around 38 months to complete, from permitting and design to the start of wafer production. European fab construction falls between these extremes, averaging about 34 months.

The cost disparity is equally striking. Construction costs for fabs in the U.S. are roughly double those in Taiwan, even though process equipment costs remain similar. Blaschitz succinctly summarized this difference: "Building a wafer fab in the West costs twice as much and takes twice the time compared to building one in Taiwan."

The primary reason for Taiwan's superior efficiency in fab construction is experience. "Their supply chain is just unbelievably good," Blaschitz explained. "And very often, it's not that they are much more precise, but they know what they are doing."

This experience translates into a more streamlined construction process. Taiwanese builders often work with less detailed information than their Western counterparts. "If you look at a drawing in Taiwan, half of the things that you would find in the Western world are missing," Blaschitz said. "They don't need that level of detail; they do it every day, and that makes them very productive."

To fully grasp the magnitude of this efficiency gap, it is essential to understand the scale of modern fab construction. Today's semiconductor manufacturing facilities are marvels of engineering and logistics. According to Blaschitz, large fabs require over $20 billion in total capital expenditure, with $4-6 billion allocated solely to the facility itself.

The construction of such a facility demands between 30 to 40 million work hours and involves managing vast quantities of materials, including 83,000 tons of steel reinforcement, 5,600 miles of cabling, and 785,000 cubic yards of concrete.

A typical large-scale fab houses a 430,000-square-foot cleanroom containing 2,000 process tools. Each tool requires an average of 50 individual process and utility connections, resulting in over 50,000 total connections throughout the facility.

The U.S. CHIPS Act aims to address this imbalance, but industry experts believe additional measures are necessary. Blaschitz advocates for "virtual commissioning" as a potential solution. This approach involves creating a digital twin of the fab during the planning and design phase, allowing for virtual commissioning before physical construction begins.

Permalink to story:

 
It is not about efficiency; it is about economic reality. Two different worlds.

Are you expecting American employees to be fine living inside paper cardboxes, eating noodles from a reusable paper cup, for breakfast, lunch and dinner?

Pretty soon we will be living in the pod and eating the bugs. The best thing is you'll be happy.
 
It is not about efficiency; it is about economic reality. Two different worlds.

Are you expecting American employees to be fine living inside paper cardboxes, eating noodles from a reusable paper cup, for breakfast, lunch and dinner?

Yes we expect Americans to work tirelessly for the man. That's a given

However Vitaly , Vitally you missed the point - the construction of the Fab, not the running of- thought mentioned lack of skill Americans ( I wonder why )

What is hilarious the red tape of EU, vs freedom loving USA - is 4 months shorter ( per article ) to build a fab

Good thing nearly all oversight depts will be disbanded and independent bodies must be subject to the new King decrees- so yes now officially Trump won the 2020 election as that is his decree
 
It is not about efficiency; it is about economic reality. Two different worlds.

Are you expecting American employees to be fine living inside paper cardboxes, eating noodles from a reusable paper cup, for breakfast, lunch and dinner?
What are you talking about. Taiwan has good living standards and high quality of life.
 
Are we really going to ignore the fact that US construction workers get paid more than the TSMC engineers in Taiwan? The word labor is completely missing from this article. This has nothing to do with efficiency what so ever and everything to do with economic realities that the US has a high labor cost market.
 
It is not about efficiency; it is about economic reality. Two different worlds.

Are you expecting American employees to be fine living inside paper cardboxes, eating noodles from a reusable paper cup, for breakfast, lunch and dinner?

So this is what TSMC does in Taiwan? Their are serious issues with migrant working conditions in Taiwan, but for native Taiwanese they do not live like this at all.

Meanwhile, back in the US of A child slavery is alive and well:

"Take a breath and consider this: The number of kids at work in the United States increased by 37 percent between 2015 and 2022. During the last two years, 14 states have either introduced or enacted legislation rolling back regulations that governed the number of hours children can be employed, lowered the restrictions on dangerous work, and legalized subminimum wages for youths.

Iowa now allows those as young as 14 to work in industrial laundries. At age 16, they can take jobs in roofing, construction, excavation, and demolition and can operate power-driven machinery. Fourteen-year-olds can now even work night shifts and once they hit 15 can join assembly lines. All of this was, of course, prohibited not so long ago."
 
It is not about efficiency; it is about economic reality. Two different worlds.

Are you expecting American employees to be fine living inside paper cardboxes, eating noodles from a reusable paper cup, for breakfast, lunch and dinner?
You're projecting the US onto Taiwan.
 
It is not about efficiency; it is about economic reality. Two different worlds.

Are you expecting American employees to be fine living inside paper cardboxes, eating noodles from a reusable paper cup, for breakfast, lunch and dinner?
Cost of living has nothing at all to do with the contents of the article. The article was all about how Americans do not have experience with building fabs and how much experience Taiwan has which is making a significant difference in how difficult building a new fab is in the US.
 
Are we really going to ignore the fact that US construction workers get paid more than the TSMC engineers in Taiwan? The word labor is completely missing from this article. This has nothing to do with efficiency what so ever and everything to do with economic realities that the US has a high labor cost market.
That literally has nothing to do with the article. The cost of a worker has no bearing on any of the issues mentioned in the article. It's taking twice as long to get the factory built than in the US that's an issue with lack of experience for the US. Costing more could simply be a matter of it taking nearly twice as long rather than the cost of each employee.

There is no way you looked at the BOM and compared the prices of everything including worker hours between the US and Taiwan then determined workers hours is what's causing the doubling of costs and nothing else.
 
Back