Survey shows Elon Musk remains popular among Republicans, but both sides dislike Mark Zuckerberg

midian182

Posts: 10,445   +139
Staff member
In a nutshell: Two of the most influential CEOs in the tech world, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, have closely aligned themselves with President Donald Trump recently, but how has that affected the nation's view of these billionaires? According to a new survey, more people dislike the pair than like them. However, while Republicans understandably have a more favorable opinion of Musk, it seems almost everyone dislikes Zuckerberg.

Between January 27, 2025 and February 2, 2025, The Pew Research Center asked just over 5,000 US adults for their opinions on Trump, his policies, and his actions so far. There were also questions to gauge Americans' view of Musk and Zuckerberg.

Musk, who has been a very vocal supporter of the president on X, is now the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Overall, the world's richest person is viewed unfavorably, though only slightly – 54% said they see him as very or mostly unfavorable, while 42% called him mostly or very favorable.

Musk's closeness to Trump means 73% of Republican voters view the Tesla boss favorably, while 85% of Democrats see him as unfavorable.

As for Zuckerberg, the Meta boss has been trying to win Trump's support since he was elected by suspending Meta's fact-checking program, reducing the amount of censorship, and recommending more political content across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. He's also been calling for more masculine energy in companies.

But Zuckerberg's efforts haven't endeared him to the public – 67% see him as unfavorable, while just 25% hold a favorable opinion.

The Meta boss might be trying to get on Trump's side, but most Republicans surveyed aren't convinced, with 60% viewing him unfavorably, not much lower than the 76% of Democrats who see him the same way.

It seems that the younger you are, the more likely you are to hold an unfavorable view of Musk and Zuckerberg, no matter your political affiliation. It's a trend that's especially evident among Republicans' opinions of Musk: while almost half (47%) of those under 30 hold an unfavorable view of him, that number falls to 23% among those aged 30 to 49, and to just 16% among over 50s.

Zuckerberg's apparent change in his political stance led to a lawyer dropping Meta as a client in January, citing its CEO's "toxic masculinity and neo-Nazi madness." But while many people left Meta's platforms following Zuckerberg's changes, user numbers have since rebounded.

Permalink to story:

 
Yet despite all this supposed "dislike", they'll just keep using their platforms.

Addicts gotta addict.

What I find more interesting, is how political affiliation seems to be the most important way to judge ANYONE. Musk has done amazing things in his life, and has earned every penny he has. He was well regarded universally until he bought X, and now he's the next Joseph Goebbles because he won't block or edit his platform to suit one side or the other. Zuckerberg, on the other hand, made an empire out of his college social platform, and is really no different from years ago either, he's just prone to the social disease of siding with whoever is on top, regardless of which side they're on.

Either way, it seems a very shallow and poor way of evaluating anyone, using a single metric. Especially when the actual truth of where both political sides stand on any given issue is buried in actual disinformation and vitriol.
 
Musk has done amazing things in his life, and has earned every penny he has. He was well regarded universally until he bought X, and now he's the next Joseph Goebbles because he won't block or edit his platform to suit one side or the other.ol.

He fell out of favor as soon as people got to know him. Because he never lets an opportunity pass by to tell us exactly what an absolute jerk he is.
 
What I find more interesting, is how political affiliation seems to be the most important way to judge ANYONE. Musk has done amazing things in his life, and has earned every penny he has. He was well regarded universally until he bought X, and now he's the next Joseph Goebbles because he won't block or edit his platform to suit one side or the other. Zuckerberg, on the other hand, made an empire out of his college social platform, and is really no different from years ago either, he's just prone to the social disease of siding with whoever is on top, regardless of which side they're on.

Either way, it seems a very shallow and poor way of evaluating anyone, using a single metric. Especially when the actual truth of where both political sides stand on any given issue is buried in actual disinformation and vitriol.

Yeah no, but you keep deluding yourself.
 
Zuck was lucky and dishonest, Musk is smart and mostly honest

Honest? The hell is he honest about? Constant lies and pretending to be a genius? If you lie about a trivial thing as being "one of the best D4 players" while at the same time being absolutely awful at the game getting carried by boosters, then imagine what kind of lies and deceiving he is doing at Federal level.

Jesus people, pull your bloody heads out your back sides.
 
Jesus people, pull your bloody heads out your back sides.
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
 
What I find more interesting, is how political affiliation seems to be the most important way to judge ANYONE. Musk has done amazing things in his life, and has earned every penny he has. He was well regarded universally until he bought X, and now he's the next Joseph Goebbles because he won't block or edit his platform to suit one side or the other. Zuckerberg, on the other hand, made an empire out of his college social platform, and is really no different from years ago either, he's just prone to the social disease of siding with whoever is on top, regardless of which side they're on.

Either way, it seems a very shallow and poor way of evaluating anyone, using a single metric. Especially when the actual truth of where both political sides stand on any given issue is buried in actual disinformation and vitriol.
That's like giving credit to Hitler for being one of the world's most strategic men in history.
 
It really don't matter what people think of Elon Musk because he don't care. The guy is worth over 300 billion dollars, do you honestly think he cares what you think of him? He didn't get to this point by worrying what people will say about him.
 
I was wondering how many posts it would take for someone to mention fascism or Hitler , I wasn't disappointed .

This forums like reddit now. Though I still enjoy the actual articles. On the subject at hand I am neutral on both of them .

 
It really don't matter what people think of Elon Musk because he don't care. The guy is worth over 300 billion dollars, do you honestly think he cares what you think of him? He didn't get to this point by worrying what people will say about him.

That's the saddest thing, though. He has everything he could ask for and yet he spends his days begging for attention.
 
It really don't matter what people think of Elon Musk because he don't care. The guy is worth over 300 billion dollars, do you honestly think he cares what you think of him? He didn't get to this point by worrying what people will say about him.

It's literally an article about what people think of him.

In this country, the United States, a man's reputation matters a great deal. The electorate's opinion of him is also relevant to our opinion of his political sponsor, the current president, Donald Trump.

So yes I do think he cares. He made his money off of consumers like me, employing my fellow countrymen in his factories and offices, selling cars to drive on roads my taxes built, and relying on markets made safe and free by the blood sacrifices of our soldiers and their families. And I do think he also committed financial crimes--market manipulation and misrepresentations to his investors.

Of course he cares about what us little people think. We make his money for him.
 
So did Hitler, voldemort and jeffery dahmer
And here we go....straight to crazy Hitler comparisons.

You really need to get a grip on the nutty stuff. This kind of stuff is one of the reason that the democratic party is in the crapper.

I was wondering how many posts it would take for someone to mention fascism or Hitler , I wasn't disappointed .

This forums like reddit now. Though I still enjoy the actual articles. On the subject at hand I am neutral on both of them .

Right....takes no time for the people too far on one side or another to get to Hitler comparisons.
They don't even realize how far they've gone.
 
Last edited:
It really don't matter what people think of Elon Musk because he don't care. The guy is worth over 300 billion dollars, do you honestly think he cares what you think of him? He didn't get to this point by worrying what people will say about him.


Musk greatly cares what people think, so many endless examples. By definition competitive, egotistical people need an audience. Thai cave - I'm Musk , I'm the hero you need

The people who don't care, you don't normally here or see them, there are some very rich Billionaires that 99% of the world have never heard about. yes you can be loud and don't care, but doesn't apply here

I don't like Steve Jobs as an apple hater, he was also self centred and narcissistic/arrogant/condescending . However I feel it is someone who does not care as much. because he had strongly internalised beliefs - so much so, it killed him early
 
And here we go....straight to crazy Hitler comparisons.

You really need to get a grip on the nutty stuff. This kind of stuff is one of the reason that the democratic party is in the crapper.



Right....takes no time for the people too far on one side or another to get to Hitler comparisons.
They don't even realize how far they've gone.


I am amused you agree on the pedo jeffery dahmer and voldemort comparison
 
Right....takes no time for the people too far on one side or another to get to Hitler comparisons.
They don't even realize how far they've gone.

KEK, this is exactly what republicans wanted. extremism in all things on both sides. Then they get all mad because now we we ALL agree that extremism is the only way to get anything done now.

extremism 24/7/365. you got what you wanted. congrats...

never relent
attack at all times
never trust
right out of the Christian republican playbook.

Burn
it
all
down
 
KEK, this is exactly what republicans wanted. extremism in all things on both sides. Then they get all mad because now we we ALL agree that extremism is the only way to get anything done now.

extremism 24/7/365. you got what you wanted. congrats...

never relent
attack at all times
never trust

Burn
it
all
down
uuhhhh...right...
tin-foil-hat-tin-foil.gif
 
Last edited:
What I find more interesting, is how political affiliation seems to be the most important way to judge ANYONE. Musk has done amazing things in his life, and has earned every penny he has. He was well regarded universally until he bought X, and now he's the next Joseph Goebbles because he won't block or edit his platform to suit one side or the other. Zuckerberg, on the other hand, made an empire out of his college social platform, and is really no different from years ago either, he's just prone to the social disease of siding with whoever is on top, regardless of which side they're on.

Either way, it seems a very shallow and poor way of evaluating anyone, using a single metric. Especially when the actual truth of where both political sides stand on any given issue is buried in actual disinformation and vitriol.

E-X-A-C-T-L-Y 100%
 
Back