Scientist worked out how to transfer data between two machines using quantum teleportation

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,369   +1,522
Staff member
Why it matters: Researchers at Oxford University published a paper in Nature last week describing how they used quantum teleportation to transfer data between two quantum computers placed about two meters apart. They claim the distance is irrelevant as the experiment should have worked regardless of each computer's location. The breakthrough is remarkable as it partially solves a stumbling block in quantum computing.

Instead of transistors, like traditional computers, quantum computers use qubits. Qubits potentially allow for more options than the on/off of transistors, facilitating far more complex calculations. However, engineers have yet to figure out how to miniaturize the hardware, and it takes tens of thousands of qubits to perform complex calculations.

In the meantime, researchers are trying to find ways to link multiple quantum computers to act as one unit. The idea is not dissimilar to distributed computing with traditional computers – connecting many computers on a network to work on one problem. Protein folding is an example. In fact, the research paper is titled "Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link."

However, quantum computers cannot communicate the same way PCs do. To network two (or more, theoretically) quantum computers, quantum objects must be positioned at the sending and receiving ends. Those objects must then become entangled. Entanglement sets both qubits to an unknown but connected state – think Schrödinger's Cat. Once the qubit's state is measured on the sending end, the entangled receiving qubit takes on the same state instantly.

Without getting deep into the complex operations of quantum computing, the act of entangling qubits on two or more machines in different locations indicates that it is possible to build a quantum network. Such interconnections can provide the necessary extra qubits to execute more complex programs and operations.

Furthermore, entangled data provides more accurate calculations. Transferring information from a quantum computer to a traditional machine that we can read and interpret presents a higher error rate – another hurdle scientists have struggled to mitigate. Transferring qubit states from one quantum computer to another is lossless, meaning researchers do not have to worry about errors until the linked computers return a result.

To achieve this breakthrough, the scientists created two ion traps (shown below) connected via a two-meter optical cable. Each trap held one strontium and one calcium ion. The calcium ion acted as a local memory unit, while the strontium acted as the interface of the quantum network. The optical cable allowed lasers to fire photons to kickstart entanglement.

Although entanglement was not 100 percent successful with every photon fired, a failure did not disrupt the states of the ions, so the researchers could keep trying without having to reset the entire experiment. Furthermore, entanglement produced a measurable photon, which signaled to the team that it achieved entanglement, a fortunate and significant byproduct.

Once entangled, the scientist could "teleport" specific gate operations to the receiving ions. After many rounds of testing Grover's algorithm, the team found the simple network returned accurate calculations about 70 percent of the time. However, they noted that the errors were unrelated to the teleportation process. As expected, local operations at either end of the hardware produced the mistakes. The team believes that using commercial quantum hardware will yeild more accurate results.

It is a groundbreaking development in quantum computing but is still in the early stages. While the teleportation is not limited by distance, it is limited to the length of optical cable available. It's unclear if it could use existing optical infrastructure, but it's doubtful, considering network noise could present an issue. Nevertheless, the fact that we have developed a way for quantum computers to exchange data instantly is astounding.

Image credit: D. Slichter, D. Main

Permalink to story:

 
to transfer data between two quantum computers placed about two meters apart. They claim the distance is irrelevant as the experiment should have worked regardless of each computer's location
This is a child's logic - can work from any distance, but better when 2 meters apart. WTF? They should be testing it at least from two opposite ends of earth, like between NY and Sydney, because that is where quantum data transfer has its value, not inside one room, for f-k sake!
 
I think I understood all the individual words in the article but just not in their current order.

The article was probably best summed up the text under the diagram that explained "CZ decompositions of the distributed iSWAP (a) and SWAP (b) circuits, comprising two and three instances of QGT, respectively". I don't mind acronyms but WTF?
 
This is a child's logic - can work from any distance, but better when 2 meters apart. WTF? They should be testing it at least from two opposite ends of earth, like between NY and Sydney, because that is where quantum data transfer has its value, not inside one room, for f-k sake!

Maybe they're trying to first test it in a small, controlled environment before trying it on other sides of the planet where all kinds of stuff can go wrong, like warping in demons from the chaos realm unexpectedly.
 
This is a child's logic - can work from any distance, but better when 2 meters apart. WTF? They should be testing it at least from two opposite ends of earth, like between NY and Sydney, because that is where quantum data transfer has its value, not inside one room, for f-k sake!
That would be one long optical cable.

The entanglement is occurring inside of each machine, to translate quantum data into a optical signal, and back again. That is why the distance is irrelevant: it relies on established computing hardware (optical modems and cables)
 
Entanglement was falsified decades ago, and yet they prattled. It was literally just the charge field, all along. All of this is fiction, just like almost all of standard QM, QED, and QCD.
 
My brain hurts! I just watch Neil D T's coverage of Schrödinger's Cat on you tube, returned here, & decided there was little point continuing with this article, as none of this quantum stuff makes sense to me. Binary does, but not quantum!
 
My brain hurts! I just watch Neil D T's coverage of Schrödinger's Cat on you tube, returned here, & decided there was little point continuing with this article, as none of this quantum stuff makes sense to me. Binary does, but not quantum!

That's because it's all fake. Tyson is an absolute fraud, and just like all the rest of them they got Schrodinger completely twisted. It doesn't make sense because it's all a lie, all of mainstream QM, QED, and QCS. Feinman even told us so just before he died, but it's all been falsified in the last twenty years outright. Quarks for example have never, ever been discovered and they're just a bad math construct pushed by people who can't do real physics.
 
Back